Skip to main content

Full text of "Less access to less information by and about the U.S. Government xxix: a 1997 chronology: June – December"

See other formats


ALA  Washington  Office  Chronology 

INFORMATION  ACCESS 

American  Library  Association,  Washington  Office 

1301  Pennsylvania  Avenue,  NW,  Suite  403 

Wasliington,  D.C.  20004  -1701 

Tel:  202-628-8410    Fax:202-628-8419    E-mail:  alawash@alawash.org    http://www.ala.org/washoff 

December  1997 


Less  Access  to  Less 

Information  By  and  About 

THE  U.S.  Government:  XXIX 

A  1997  Chronology:  June  -  December 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2010 


http://www.archive.org/cletails/lessaccesstoless29amer 


Less  Access  to  Less  Information  By  and  About 

THE  U.S.  Government:  XXIX 

A  1997  Chronology:  June  -  December 


contents 

Introduction 4 


JUNE 

Federal  agencies  disagree  about  evidence  regarding 

veterans'  illnesses 5 

House  Committee  criticizes  U.S.  intelligence 

agencies 5 

Research  needed  before  government  databases  can 

be  easily  accessible  to  public 5 

Army  charged  with  destroying  sex  survey  data 6 

More  troops  were  exposed  to  chemicals  in  area  of 

Iraqi  dump 6 

ALA  joins  in  suit  to  preserve  electronic  federal 

records 6 

Right-to-knovv  week  celebrated 7 

JULY 

Freedom  of  Information  Act  implemented 

unevenly 7 

AUGUST 

State  Department  implements  900  number  for  passport 

information 8 

CIA  criticized  for  withholding  information 8 

Cold  War  deception  fueled  UFO  controversy 8 

Intelligence  community  delays  release  of  historic 

records 9 

Privatizing  the  public's  business  deplored 10 

SEPTEMBER 

Gag  ordered  on  Air  Force  readiness  reports 10 

Film  makers  warned  about  bomb  blasts,  but  not  the 
general  public 10 

OCTOBER 

CIA  reveals  U.S.  intelligence  budget  $26.6 

billion 11 

Government  contractor  threatens  to  sue  to  prevent 
release  of  transplant  data 11 


NOVEMBER 

Compromise  reached  on  sampling  for  the  2000 

census 12 

National  Academy  of  Sciences  exempted  from 

open  access  law 12 

Plan  revealed  to  blame  Castro  if  Glenn  mission 

failed 12 

National  Archives  destroys  Naval  Research 

Laboratory'  historical  records 12 

DECEMBER 

Tape  transcripts  reveal  Nixon  White  House  media 

strategy 13 

U.S.  role  in  melting  Nazi  gold  revealed  in  long-secret 

documents 13 

U.S.  argues  that  cutting  would  jeopardize  Nixon 

tapes 14 

U.S.  sued  for  violating  Freedom  of  Information 

Act 14 

Tobacco  industry  turns  over  documents  to 

Congress 14 

White  House  continues  pattern  of  belated  release 

of  subpoenaed  material 15 

Attorney  General  declines  to  hand  over  FBI  memo 

to  Congress 15 

Judge  orders  government  to  pay  sanctions  for  with 

holding  information 15 

A  HANDFUL  OF  EXAMPLES  ABOUT 
"MORE  ACCESS" 

EPA  plans  expansion  of  "right-to-know" 16 

Americans  can  provide  more  information  about 

themselves 16 

Best  federal  government  web  sites  chosen 16 

Government  Printing  Office  thrives  in  electronic  age..  17 

The  COGI  Madison  Awards  honor  champions  of 
the  public's  right  to  know 19 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


Less  Access  to  Less  Information  By  and  About 

THE  U.S.  Government:  XXIX 

A  1997  Chronology:  June  -  December 


INTRODUCTION 


For  the  past  16  years,  this  ongoing  selective 
chronology  has  documented  efforts  to  restrict  and 
privatize  government  information.   It  is  distrib- 
uted as  a  supplement  to  the  ALA  Washington 
Office  Newsletter  and  as  an  electronic  publication 
at  http://www.ala.org/washoff/lessaccess.  While 
government  information  is  more  accessible 
through  computer  networks  and  the  Freedom  of 
Information  Act,  there  are  still  barriers  to  public 
access.   The  latest  damaging  disclosures  facing 
the  Clinton  Administration  involve  allegations  of 
concealing  information  and  claiming  executive 
privilege.   Continuing  revelations  of  Cold  War 
secrecy  show  how  government  information  has 
been  concealed,  resulting  in  a  lack  of  public 
accountability  and  cost  to  taxpayers. 

Another  development,  with  major  implications 
for  public  access,  is  the  growing  tendency  of  fed- 
eral agencies  to  use  computer  and  telecommunica- 
tion technologies  for  data  collection,  storage, 
retrieval,  and  dissemination.   This  trend  has 
resulted  in  the  increased  emergence  of  contractual 
arrangements  with  commercial  firms  to  dissemi- 
nate information  collected  at  taxpayer  expense, 
higher  user  charges  for  government  information, 
and  the  proliferation  of  government  information 
available  in  electronic  format  only.  This  trend 
toward  electronic  dissemination  is  occurring  in  all 
three  branches  of  government.   While  automation 
clearly  offers  promises  of  savings,  will  public 
access  to  government  information  be  further 
restricted  for  people  who  cannot  afford  computers 
or  pay  for  computer  time? 

On  the  other  hand,  the  Government  Printing 
Office  GPO  Access  system  and  the  Library  of 


Congress  THOMAS  system  have  enhanced  public 
access  by  providing  free  online  access  to  govern- 
ment databases. 

Recognizing  that  some  federal  agencies  are  suc- 
ceeding in  using  technology  to  enhance  public 
access  to  government  information,  this  update 
includes  selected  examples  of  such  successes. 

ALA  continues  to  reaffirm  its  long-standing 
conviction  that  open  government  is  vital  to  a 
democracy.   A  January  1984  resolution  passed  by 
ALA's  Council  stated  that  "there  should  be  equal 
and  ready  access  to  data  collected,  compiled,  pro- 
duced, and  published  in  any  format  by  the  govern- 
ment of  the  United  States." 

In  1986,  ALA  initiated  a  Coalition  on 
Government  Information.   The  Coalition's  objec- 
tives are  to  focus  national  attention  on  all  efforts 
that  limit  access  to  government  information,  and 
to  develop  support  for  improvements  in  access  to 
government  information.  Since  1989,  the 
Coalition  has  presented  the  James  Madison  Award 
to  champions  of  the  public's  right  to  know.  The 
awardees  are  listed  in  this  update. 

With  access  to  information  a  major  ALA  priori- 
ty, library  advocates  should  be  concerned  about 
barriers  to  public  access  to  government  informa- 
tion.  Previous  chronologies  were  compiled  in  two 
ALA  Washington  Office  indexed  publications. 
Less  Access  to  Less  Information  By  and  About 
the  U.S.  Government:  A  1981-1987  Chronology, 
and  Less  Access  to  Less  Information  By  and 
About  the  U.S.  Government:  A  1988-1991 
Chronology.   The  following  selected  chronology 
continues  the  tradition  of  a  semi-annual  update.  ♦ 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


CHRONOLOGY 


JUNE 

Federal  agencies  disagree  about  evidence  regard- 
ing veterans'  illnesses 

The  Pentagon  took  the  unusual  step  of  disputing  a 
General  Accounting  Office  draft  report  before  it  was 
to  have  been  released  later  the  same  month.  The 
GAO  report  asserted  there  is  "substantial  evidence" 
that  low-level  exposure  to  poison  gas  weapons  could 
cause  delayed  or  long-term  ailments  of  Gulf  War  vet- 
erans. The  Pentagon  and  a  presidential  panel 
appointed  by  President  Clinton  to  look  into  the  Gulf 
War  veterans'  illnesses  said  the  GAO  had  reached 
different  and  unwarranted  conclusions  after  analyzing 
the  same  scientific  research  and  data  they  had 
reviewed. 

In  a  10-page  rebuttal,  Joyce  C.  Lashof,  chair  of  the 
Presidential  Advisory  Committee  on  Gulf  War 
Illness,  said  overall  the  GAO  report  "misrepresents" 
her  panel's  work,  is  "lacking  in  substantiation  and 
analytic  rigor,"  and  makes  statements  that  are  "spe- 
cious and  misleading."  The  presidential  advisory 
committee  concluded  that  "stress,  rather  than  Iraqi 
chemical  and  biological  weapons,  were  the  likely 
cause  of  veterans'  health  problems."  The  GAO  said 
the  panel  had  "overemphasized  stress  as  a  factor." 

Like  the  Pentagon,  members  of  the  presidential 
advisory  committee  have  also  been  accused  by  veter- 
ans advocates  and  others  as  part  of  a  government- 
wide  coverup  of  the  facts  about  Gulf  War  veterans' 
illnesses.  (Priest,  Dana.  "GAO  Draft  Report 
Suggests  Link  Between  Gas,  Gulf  Vets'  Illness,"  The 
Washington  Post,  June  17,  1997,  A2.) 

[Ed.Note:  The  140-page  General  Accounting 
Office  report,  Gulf  War  Illnesses:  Improved 
Monitoring  of  Clinical  Progress  and  Reexamination 
of  Research  Emphasis  Are  Needed  (GAO/NSIAD- 
97-163),  can  be  found  on  the  World  Wide  Web  at: 
http://www.gao.gov] 


House  Committee  criticizes  U.S.  intelligence 
agencies 

The  U.S.  House  of  Representatives  Intelligence 
Committee  criticized  U.S.  intelligence  agencies  in  a 
sharply  written  report  on  the  fiscal  1998  intelligence 
authorization  bill.  The  report  said  the  agencies  have 
"limited  analytical  capabilities"  and  an  "uncertain 
commitment  and  capability  to  collect  human  intelli- 
gence on  a  worldwide  basis  through  espionage."  The 
Committee  also  said  the  continued  expenditure  by  the 
Central  Intelligence  Agency  of  "billions"  on  high- 
tech  satellites  is  disturbing  because  it  failed  to  allo- 
cate adequate  funds  to  review,  analyze  and  present 
the  data  to  policy  makers  and  military  commanders 
in  a  usable  form.  "Expending  resources  to  collect 
intelligence  that  is  not  being  analyzed  is  simply  a 
waste  of  money,"  the  report  said. 

The  House  panel  pointed  out  that  other  countries 
are  learning  how  to  block  satellite  coverage  that  "will 
affect  how  the  intelligence  community  collects  infor- 
mation and. ..what  targets  remain  viable."  Joining 
earlier  criticism  by  the  Senate  Intelligence 
Committee,  the  House  panel  cited  "a  largely  inexpe- 
rienced work  force,  lack  of  foreign  language  skills 
and  limited  in-country  familiarity."  (Pincus,  Walter. 
"Intelligence  Community  Faulted  by  House  Panel," 
The  Washington  Post,  June  19,  1997,  A19.) 

Research  needed  before  government  databases 
can  be  easily  accessible  to  public 

According  to  a  new  report,  "Toward  the  Digital 
Government  of  the  21st  Century,"  private  industry 
and  government  need  to  research  how  public  infor- 
mation can  be  aggregated,  updated,  and  made  easily 
accessible  through  several  World  Wide  Web  sites. 
Herbert  Schorr,  executive  director  of  the  University 
of  Southem  California's  Information  Sciences 
Institute,  coauthor  of  the  study,  said:  "The  Internet 
has  exacerbated  the  expectations  of  people.  We  need 
to  provide  citizens  with  more  access  to  the  informa- 
tion the  government  has  about  them  as  well  as  other 
data  they  seek." 

The  report  states,  "The  federal  government  is  still 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


providing  information  services  using  technology  that 
is,  in  large  measure,  several  generations  behind  the 
current  Intemet  and  Web  style  of  information." 
Among  the  things  the  authors  recommend  from  the 
government  are:  coordinate  agency  research  so  that 
more  government  databases  are  compatible  and  sim- 
pler to  connect  to  the  Net;  create  standards  for  main- 
taining federal  and  local  statistics  so  they  can  be  easi- 
ly combined  and  published  online;  allow  data  to  be 
seen  using  multiple  interfaces;  and  build  "virtual 
agencies"  so  that  people  can  access  documents  or 
services.  (Macavinta,  Courtney.   "Report: 
Govemment  files  a  mess,"  news.com,  June  25,  1997 
-  http://www.news.com/News/Item/ 
0,4,11926,00.html) 

Army  charged  with  destroying  sex  survey  data 

A  researcher  charged  a  secretive  Army  panel  look- 
ing into  sexual  misconduct  with  destroying  some 
highly  sensitive  date  it  had  collected  from  a  survey  of 
9,000  troops.  Leora  Rosen,  who  works  in  the  depart- 
ment of  military  psychiatry  at  Walter  Reed  Army 
Medical  Center,  said  "the  Panel's  apparent  intention 
is  to  suppress  this  information  in  order  to  avoid  mak- 
ing the  Army  look  bad."  Rosen,  who  has  filed  a 
whistleblower  complaint  with  the  Office  of  Special 
Counsel,  analyzed  613  surveys  that  escaped  destruc- 
tion. The  data  purged  included  questions  about  the 
use  of  prostitutes  and  pomography  in  Army  units. 

"A  spokesman  for  the  Army  confirmed  that  some 
survey  data  had  been  destroyed.   'The  raw  data  from 
those  sex  questions  no  longer  exists,'  Col.  John  Smith 
said."  An  Army  statement  said  the  questions 
destroyed  were  "inflammatory  and  offensive  and  felt 
by  some  soldiers  to  be  an  invasion  of  privacy  to  the 
extent  that  some  of  them  refused  to  comply  with  the 
survey."  Rosen  said  Army  officials  had  spoken  at  a 
panel  meeting  about  the  possibility  of  destroying  all 
the  raw  survey  data,  not  just  the  most  controversial 
questions,  in  order  to  control  how  the  results  were 
interpreted.  The  Army  would  not  say  whether  the 
raw  data  would  be  available  in  full,  although  the  sur- 
vey results  will  be  released  in  some  form. 

The  panel,  appointed  by  Army  Secretary  Togo  D. 
West,  Jr.  after  revelations  of  wide-spread  sexual 


abuse  at  the  Aberdeen  Proving  Ground,  has  gone  to 
extraordinary'  lengths  to  keep  its  work  secret. 
Madeline  Morris,  a  Duke  University  law  professor 
who  consulted  with  West,  said  the  Army's  actions 
"raises  questions  about  why  the  Army  would  elimi- 
nate data  they  had  already  collected,  rather  than  ana- 
lyze it,  when  that  data  could  be  relevant  to  the  ques- 
tions they  are  asking:  What  causes  sexual  harass- 
ment?" (Priest,  Dana.   "Army  Panel  Destroyed  Data 
on  Sex  Survey,"  The  Washington  Post,  June  27,  1997, 
A21.) 

More  troops  were  exposed  to  chemicals  in  area  of 
Iraqi  dump 

The  Pentagon  has  again  revised  upward  the  num- 
ber of  troops  estimated  to  have  been  exposed  to  an 
Iraqi  chemical  dump  when  it  was  destroyed  in  the 
1991.  The  estimate  was  said  to  be  27,000,  up  from 
21,000  made  earlier  in  1997.  Thousands  of  Persian 
Gulf  War  veterans  have  complained  of  ills,  but  no 
cause  has  been  found  for  the  complaints.  Congress 
has  accused  the  Pentagon  and  White  House  of  failure 
to  properly  investigate  the  matter.   (Reuter.  "U.S. 
Raises  Estimate  of  Troops  Near  Iraqi  Chemical 
Arms,  The  Washington  Post,  June  27,  1997,  A26.) 

ALA  joins  in  suit  to  preserve  electronic  federal 
records 

Several  independent  researchers  and  nonprofit 
organizations,  including  the  American  Library 
Association,  filed  a  law  suit  in  federal  court  against 
the  Archivist  of  the  United  States  because  he  issued 
guidance  in  1995  that  authorized  govemment  agen- 
cies to  destroy  electronic  mail  and  other  computer- 
ized records  without  regard  for  their  content.    The 
regulation  permits  destruction  of  electronic  records 
once  they  have  been  copied  on  paper  or  some  other 
format  and  are  "no  longer  needed  for  updating  or 
revision."  The  complaint  sought  to  invalidate  the 
rule  and  accused  Archivist  John  Carlin  of  abdicating 
his  responsibility  to  appraise  the  value  of  the  elec- 
tronic records  on  an  agency-by-agency  basis.   "It's 
the  electronic  shredder,"  protested  one  of  the  plain- 
tiffs, author-researcher  Scott  Armstrong. 

Justice  Department  lawyers  argued  that  the  regula- 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


tion  was  solidly  grounded  and  that  federal  agencies 
cannot  have  efficient  records-management  programs 
if  they  cannot  get  rid  of  unneeded  records.  Justice 
Department  Attorney  Anne  Weismann  said  that  "the 
vast  majority"  of  government  agencies  are  not 
equipped  to  preserve  computer  records  in  an  elec- 
tronic format.  Public  Citizen  attorney  Michael 
Tankersley  said,  "The  archivist  has  opened  the  flood- 
gates, allowing  agencies  to  destroy  records  without 
regard  for  their  historical  value."  (Lardner,  George. 
"Record-Destruction  Order  Assailed,"  The 
Washington  Post,  June  28,  1997,  A8.) 

[Ed.  Note:  On  October  22,  U.S.  District  Court 
Judge  Paul  Freidman  ruled  that  the  Archivist  was 
wrong  to  allow  federal  agencies  routinely  to  destroy 
the  electronic  versions  of  word  processing  and  elec- 
tronic mail  records  even  if  paper  copies  were  made. 
(Miller,  Page  Putnam.   "Court  Rules  Against  the 
National  Archives  in  Case  on  Regulations  for 
Destroying  Electronic  Records."  NCC  Washington 
Update,  vol.  3,  #44,  November  6,  1997.) 

Right-to-know  week  celebrated 

An  editorial  in  the  San  Francisco  Chronicle 
announced  that  the  American  Society  of  Newspaper 
Editors  had  designated  "Your  Right  to  Know  Week" 
to  celebrate  the  First  Amendment  and  sunshine  laws 
that  help  the  public  keep  an  eye  on  the  inner  work- 
ings of  government.   It  pointed  out  that  with  a  few, 
clearly  defined  exceptions,  "there  is  relatively  little 
official  business  that  legally  can  be  kept  secret  from 
the  public.  However,  there  continues  to  be  a  struggle 
between  reporters  who  always  want  more  and 
bureaucrats  whose  instincts  are  often  to  conceal, 
especially  information  that  might  embarrass  them  or 
their  bosses."  The  editorial  also  said  that  the  Internet 
has  brought  new  opportunities  for  government 
access,  and  that  the  press  and  public  must  be  alert  to 
new  technology  that  can  expand  access  to  govern- 
ment. ("Your  Right  to  Know  Week,"  San  Francisco 
Chronicle,  June  30,  1997,  Ml.) 


JULY 

Freedom  of  Information  Act  implemented 
unevenly 

After  President  Lyndon  Johnson  signed  the 
Freedom  of  Information  Act  in  1966,  it  was  amended 
in  the  1970s  to  make  it  quicker  and  easier  to  use. 
Since  then  its  use  has  increased  steadily,  and  current- 
ly, about  600,000  FOIA  requests  are  filed  with  the 
federal  government  each  year.  Most  experts  estimate 
that  reporters  file  about  5  percent  of  the  requests. 
The  act's  users  also  include  historians,  prisoners  and 
individual  citizens  trying  to  find  out  such  things  as 
what  files  the  government  has  on  them.  John  Fialka, 
a  Wall  Street  Journal  reporter  and  author,  writes  that 
60  percent  of  FOIA  requests  are  filed  by  businesses 
trying  to  gather  information  on  competing  firms.  He 
said  it  costs  up  to  $100  million  a  year  to  carry  out  the 
federal  law,  and  believes  fees  for  commercial  users 
should  be  sufficient  to  cover  the  law's  overhead. 
Otherwise,  the  law  should  be  abolished,  he  said. 

"The  backlog  of  FOIA  requests  at  some  agencies 
is  so  great  that  users  often  wait  one  to  three  years." 
Some  researchers  and  reporters  have  waited  up  to  10 
years  to  have  requests  filled.  The  act's  nine  exemp- 
tions cover  national  security,  confidential  business 
information  and  records  that  would  violate  an  indi- 
vidual's privacy.  Experts  say  the  latter  exemption  has 
been  used  increasingly  to  deny  access  to  records. 
"The  approach  that  some  agencies  have  taken  is  that 
anything  that  has  somebody's  name  on  it  will  be 
withholdable,  either  in  whole  or  part,"  said  Jane 
Kirtley,  executive  director  of  the  Reporters 
Committee  for  Freedom  of  the  Press.  Tom  Blanton, 
director  of  the  National  Security  Archive,  has  had  to 
battle  the  impulse  of  many  agencies  to  deny  requests 
even  when  disclosure  of  records  would  appear  harm- 
less. Blanton  said,  "It's  a  reflexive  secrecy.  You  tap 
on  a  knee  and  the  foot  kicks  out.  You  call  an  agency 
and  the  top-secret  stamp  hits  the  page." 

But  the  author  says  that  some  agencies  are  forth- 
coming with  records,  like  the  Food  and  Drug 
Administration,  the  Department  of  Health  and 
Human  Services,  and  the  Defense  Department. 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


7 


Agencies  notorious  for  responding  slowly  include  the 
State  Department,  the  Federal  Bureau  of 
Investigation  and  the  Central  Intelligence  Agency. 
(Armstrong,  Ken.  "The  Trickle  of  Information  Act  Is 
Closer  to  Truth,"  Chicago  Tribune,  July  4,  1997,  19.) 


AUGUST 

State  Department  implements  900  number  for 
passport  information 

Americans  seeking  passport  information  were 
charged  as  much  as  $60  on  their  phone  bills  when 
they  called  a  900  number  operated  by  AT&T 
Corporation.   Unlike  the  800  number  system  used  by 
agencies  such  as  the  Social  Security  Administration 
and  IRS,  the  900  is  not  toll  free.   Customers  are 
charged  35  cents  to  hear  basic  recorded  information 
or  $1.05  per  minute  to  talk  to  a  representative.  The 
telephone  representatives  no  longer  are  employees  of 
the  Department  of  State,  but  work  on  a  contract 
through  AT&T.   "This  is  a  bad  precedent  to  allow," 
said  Representative  Gary  Ackerman  (D-NY),  "You 
could  wind  up  with  every  federal  agency  taxing  the 
citizenry  a  second  time  for  basic  information."  Nyda 
Budig,  spokeswoman  for  the  State  Department's 
Bureau  of  Consular  Affairs,  said  privatizing  the  func- 
tion improved  service  and  saved  most  taxpayers 
money  by  making  users  pay  for  it. 

But  critics  of  the  contract  arrangement  think  it 
should  be  the  department  and  not  customers  who  pay 
for  the  service.  The  House  passed  a  State 
Department  authorization  bill  that  would  earmark  $5 
million  to  pay  for  800  number  lines  to  be  run  by  the 
contractors.  Although  similar  language  is  not  in  a 
comparable  Senate  bill,  Ackerman  said  it  may  be 
approved  by  budget  negotiators.  (Daniel,  Lisa. 
"Passport  Office  Charging  Callers,"  Federal  Times, 
August  4,  1997,7.) 

CIA  criticized  for  withholding  information 

The  New  York  Times  criticized  the  CIA's  withhold- 
ing of  information  about  its  own  files  on  crimes  in 


Latin  America  as  truth  commissions  in  several  coun- 
tries began  to  investigate  the  human  rights  abuses  of 
the  past.  At  the  same  time,  the  New  York  Times 
acknowledged  that  the  CIA  had  released  some 
records  on  the  1954  military  coup  it  organized  in 
Guatemala,  and  promised  more  coup  records  in  the 
months  ahead. 

But  it  has  declassified  practically  nothing  on  the 
security  forces  that  have  killed  more  than  1 10,000 
Guatemalans  since  the  coup.   "Washington  trained 
and  supported  some  of  these  forces.   It  also  backed 
abusive  internal  security  organizations  in  Nicaragua, 
Hpiti,  Honduras  and  El  Salvador.   It  owes  the  victims 
of  these  groups  whatever  information  it  has."  The 
editorial  concluded  that  the  agency's  continued  secre- 
cy serves  to  protect  it  from  embarrassment. 
("History  That  Remains  Hidden,"  The  New  York 
Times,  August  5,  1997  -  http://www. 
newyorktimes.com/yr/mo/day/editorial/05tue3.html.) 

Cold  War  deception  fueled  UFO  controversy 

According  to  CIA  historian  Gerald  Haines,  during 
the  1950s  and  1960s,  the  Air  Force  and  CIA  "willful- 
ly misled"  the  public  by  claiming  that  thousands  of 
sightings  of  unidentified  flying  objects  were  caused 
by  ice  crystals,  temperature  inversions  and  other  nat- 
ural causes,  when  actually  they  were  produced  by  the 
flight  of  super-secret  spy  planes.  Writing  in  the 
declassified  version  of  Studies  of  Intelligence,  Haines 
concluded  that  more  than  half  of  all  UFO  sightings  in 
the  United  States  for  decades  "were  accounted  for  by 
manned  Reconnaissance  flights." 

During  this  time,  believers  in  UFOs  thrived  on  the 
belief  that  the  U.S.  government  covered  up  crucial 
information  about  mysterious  flying  objects.  Haines 
said  that  in  thousands  of  cases,  they  were  right.  His 
study  found  that  the  government  concocted  the  expla- 
nations both  to  calm  fears  about  UFOs  and  to  main- 
tain secrecy  about  its  most  advanced  espionage  air- 
craft at  the  time,  the  U-2  and  the  SR-71  Blackbird. 

National  security  officials  justified  their  deception 
"to  allay  public  fears  and  protect  an  extraordinarily 
sensitive  national  security  project,"  wrote  Haines. 
"While  perhaps  justified,  this  deception  added  fuel  to 
the  later  conspiracy  theories  and  the  coverup  contro- 


8 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


versy"  of  later  years.   Questioned  in  early  August 
1997,  Air  Force  Brig.  Gen.  Ronald  Sconyers  said,  "I 
cannot  confirm  or  deny  that  we  lied.  The  Air  Force 
is  committed  to  providing  accurate  and  timely  infor- 
mation within  the  confines  of  national  security."  The 
spokesman  said,  "Corporately  and  institutionally, 
there  is  no  Air  Force  or  Defense  Department  game 
plan"  currently  in  place  to  intentionally  mislead  the 
public  in  order  to  conceal  secrets.   UFO  experts  and 
government  secrecy  watch-dogs  said  the  CIA  study  is 
a  refreshingly  revealing  document  but  unlikely  to 
repair  the  government's  credibility  problem  among 
those  who  believe  that  the  government  has  tried  to 
conceal  evidence  of  extraterrestrial  visitors  to  Earth. 
(Priest,  Dana.   "Cold  War  UFO  Coverup  Shielded 
Spy  Planes,"  The  Washington  Post,  Augusts,  1997, 
A4.) 

Intelligence  community  delays  release  of  historic 
records 

The  annual  report  of  the  Historical  Advisory 
Committee  (HAC)  is  highly  critical  of  the  intelli- 
gence community,  primarily  the  Central  Intelligence 
Agency,  for  maintaining  barriers  to  opening  the  his- 
torical record  of  United  States  foreign  policy  and 
diplomacy.  The  government-appointed  panel  was 
created  following  the  embarrassment  that  resulted 
from  publication  in  the  late  1980s  of  a  volume  of  the 
Federal  Relations  of  the  United  States  (FRUS)  that 
ignored  the  use  by  the  U.S.  government  of  covert 
activities  to  influence  U.S. -Iranian  relations  in  the 
mid-1950s  .  For  four  years  the  CIA  has  acknowl- 
edged conducting  at  least  eleven  covert  activities  dur- 
ing the  Cold  War,  but  has  declassified  enough  infor- 
mation to  delineate  U.S.  foreign  policy  only  in 
British  Guiana.  As  a  result,  a  number  of  volumes  of 
the  FRUS  are  delayed  awaiting  the  outcome  of 
repeated  declassification  appeals. 

The  report  states  that  "a  number  of  FRUS  compila- 
tions now  stand  in  never-never  land,  and  the  HAC  is 
forced  to  contemplate  recommending  against  publica- 
tion because  the  thirty-year  old  historical  record  is  or 
will  fall  grossly  short  of  a  complete  record  including 
the  relevant  intelligence  involvement."    The 
Committee  said  it  is  "increasingly  disinclined"  to 


resort  to  stating  in  Prefaces  to  the  FRUS  that  the  vol- 
ume in  question  constitutes  an  inaccurate  and  incom- 
plete record  when  the  Committee  "knows  that  the 
documentary  record  is  or  is  likely  to  be  available  in 
government  archives."  The  Committee  said  many 
covert  activities  have  been  revealed  in  various  offi- 
cial (e.g.  Congressional  hearings)  and  semi-official 
(memoirs  by  CIA  agents)  sources.   "Such  a  compro- 
mise is  especially  ludicrous  with  regard  to  the  specif- 
ic covert  activities  now  acknowledged  by  the  CIA." 

The  Report  of  the  Advisory  Committee  on 
Historical  Diplomatic  Documentation  to  the  United 
States  Department  of  State  is  in  the  form  of  a  June 
26,  1997,  letter  to  Secretary  of  State  Madeleine 
Albright  from  Warren  F.  Kimball,  Chair.  The  report 
came  weeks  after  the  CIA  acknowledged  it  had 
destroyed  some  records  of  covert  activities  undertak- 
en in  the  1950s  and  1960s  but  the  agency  said 
destruction  was  to  clear  out  shelf  space,  not  to  con- 
ceal its  activities.  CIA  spokesman  Mark  Mansfield 
said  "The  reason  why  information  would  be  withheld 
concerns  protection  of  sources  and  methods."  But 
Dr.  Kimball  said  the  committee  was  not  trying  to 
publish  such  sensitive  information.   (Haworth,  Karla. 
"Committee  of  Historians  Says  CIA  Balks  at 
Releasing  30-Year-Old  Documents,"  The  Chronicle 
of  Higher  Education,  August  11,  1997  -  Academe 
Today  electronic  news  service.) 

[Ed.  Note:  The  report  is  available  online  at: 
http:/Avww.fas.  org/sgp/advisory/hac96.html] 

Privatizing  the  public's  business  deplored 

In  an  opinion  piece,  Robert  Kuttner  said:  "A  hall- 
mark danger  of  this  era  is  that  the  public's  business  is 
becoming  privatized.  Industry  wants  to  replace  pub- 
lic agencies  and  public  processes  with  private  con- 
tractors and  private  deals.  And  there  is  far  too  little 
public  protest."  He  observed  that  the  Food  and  Drug 
Administration  appears  to  be  "public  enemy  number 
one."  As  an  example  of  efforts  to  weaken  the  FDA, 
he  pointed  to  the  proposed  tobacco  accord  reached 
through  secret  negotiations.   Kuttner  said  "a  group  of 
self-appointed  spokesmen  for  the  public's  health  and 
some  state  attorneys  general,  lured  by  the  prospect  of 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


a  large  payment  from  the  tobacco  industry,  have  cut  a 
proposed  deal  that  limits  the  industry's  total  liability 
for  damages  and  reins  in  the  FDA." 

Kuttner  then  pointed  to  efforts  by  the  medical 
device  industry  to  limit  the  ability  to  ensure  the  safe- 
ty and  efficacy  of  everything  from  artificial  heart 
valves  to  super-tampons.  The  $50-billion-a-year 
medical  device  business  is  one  of  America's  most 
profitable.  He  said  this  industry  hopes  to  get 
Congress  to  pass  legislation  that  would  partly  priva- 
tize the  FDA's  function  of  certifying  safe  products. 
"Instead  of  having  to  pass  muster  with  the  FDA,  a 
manufacturer  could  submit  a  new  product  to  a  private 
review  firm  selected  by  the  very  company  seeking 
approval."  And  these  same  private  consultants  could 
do  other  contract  work  for  the  device  manufacturers, 
setting  up  a  conflict  of  interest. 

Kuttner  asked:  "What  entrepreneur  would  put 
other  business  at  risk  by  vetoing  a  client's  new  prod- 
uct application?"    The  author  maintained  that  instead 
of  trying  to  cripple  the  FDA,  industry  should  be 
thankful  for  it  since  the  FDA  offers  their  products  a 
worldwide  seal  of  approval  that  consumers  can  trust- 
contributing  to  the  industry's  global  preeminence. 
(Kuttner,  Robert.   "Privatizing  the  Public's  Business," 
The  Washington  Post,  August  29,  1997,  A23.) 


SEPTEMBER 

Gag  ordered  on  Air  Force  readiness  reports 

Louis  Finch,  Defense  Department  deputy  under- 
secretary for  readiness,  issued  a  gag  order  to  his  staff 
who  go  on  field  trips  to  assess  military  readiness.  In 
the  August  7  memorandum  he  also  reserved  the  right 
to  declare  secret  what  they  learn.  According  to  his 
ground  rules,  trip  information: 

•  "Will  not  contain  editorializing,  opinions  or  spec- 

ulations of  team  members  or  others." 

•  "Will  not  be  transferred  electronically  among 

participants  or  shared  with  others  without  my 
consent." 

•  "Will  not  be  printed  on  letterhead,  contain  refer- 


ence to  intended  recipient  or  indicate  coordinat- 
ing officials  until  it  is  in  final  form." 
•  "Will  not  contain  the  names  of  anyone  visited  in 

the  field." 
Finch's  memo  was  issued  after  a  draft  "trip  report" 
concluded  "limited  wartime  sortie  generation  capabil- 
ity exists  today"  in  the  Air  Force  because  so  many 
planes  can't  fly  for  lack  of  engines  and  spare  parts. 
The  report  also  said  morale  was  low  among  active- 
duty  personnel  and  that  they  distrust  senior  leaders. 
(Wilson,  George  C.   "Gag  Order  Issued  on  Readiness 
Reports,"  Federal  Times,  September  1,  1997,  11.) 

Film  makers  warned  about  bomb  blasts,  but  not 
the  general  public 

During  the  1950s,  the  government  assured  the 
public  that  there  was  no  health  threat  from  atmos- 
pheric nuclear  tests.  Yet  at  the  same  time,  the 
Atomic  Energy  Commission  regularly  warned  film 
manufacturers  about  fallout  that  could  damage  their 
products  according  to  a  review  of  documents  made 
public  as  part  of  an  "openness  initiative"  by  former 
Secretary  of  Energy  Hazel  O'Leary.  The  nonprofit 
Institute  for  Energy  and  Environmental  Research  said 
Eastman  Kodak  had  threatened  to  sue  the  Atomic 
Energy  Commission  when  some  of  its  film  was 
fogged  before  use  and  the  problem  was  traced  to  fall- 
out from  U.S.  and  Russian  nuclear  tests.  The  AEC 
then  promised  to  warn  Kodak  about  future  tests. 

The  National  Cancer  Institute  said  in  August  that 
fallout  from  the  blasts  had  probably  caused  10,000  to 
75,000  extra  thyroid  cancers.   Senator  Tom  Harkin 
(D-IA)  said,  "It  really  is  odd  that  the  Government 
would  warn  Kodak  about  its  film  but  it  wouldn't 
warn  the  general  public  about  the  milk  it  was  drink- 
ing." Iodine- 13  is  absorbed  by  cows  and  incorporat- 
ed into  milk.   In  humans,  it  concentrates  in  the  thy- 
roid gland,  where  it  can  cause  cancer.   Senator 
Harkin  said  that  part  of  his  thyroid  was  removed  17 
years  ago  and  that  his  brother  died  of  thyroid  cancer 
last  year.   (Wald,  Matthew  L.   "U.S.  Alerted  Photo 
Film  Makers,  Not  Public,  About  Bomb  Fallout,"  The 
New  York  Times,  September  30,  1997,  A18.) 

[Ed.  Note:  The  final  fallout  report  of  the  National 


10 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


Cancer  Institute  is  available  online  at 
http://rex.nci.nih.gov/massmedia/Fallout/ 
index,  html] 


OCTOBER 

CIA  reveals  U.S.  intelligence  budget  $26.6 
billion 

After  50  years  of  secrecy,  under  pressure  from  a 
Freedom  of  Information  law  suit,  the  CIA  disclosed 
that  the  United  States  spends  $26.6  billion  a  year  on 
intelligence  matters.  The  agency,  which  itself  spends 
about  $3  billion  a  year,  oversees  a  covertly  appropri- 
ated sum  from  which  billions  are  drawn  by  other 
government  intelligence  agencies  including  the 
National  Security  Agency  and  the  National  Imagery 
and  Mapping  Agency.  CIA  director  George  Tenet 
said  the  disclosure  "does  not  jeopardize"  national 
security  and  "serves  to  inform  the  American  people." 
Kate  Martin,  the  attorney  who  filed  the  law  suit,  said: 
"now  we  can  begin  to  have  some  real  democratic 
debate  on  the  size  of  the  intelligence  budget.  The 
C.I.A.'s  refusal  to  disclose  the  figure  didn't  protect 
national  security.   It  shut  citizens  out  of  the  debate 
about  the  usefulness  and  future  of  the  C.I.  A." 
Martin,  director  of  the  Center  for  National  Security 
Studies,  filed  the  suit  on  behalf  of  the  Federation  of 
American  Scientists'  government  secrecy  project. 
(Weiner,  Tim.   "For  First  Time,  U.S.  Discloses 
Spying  Budget,"  The  New  York  Times,  October  16, 
1997,27) 

Government  contractor  threatens  to  sue  to 
prevent  release  of  transplant  data 

The  United  Network  for  Organ  Sharing,  a  private 
group  that  operates  the  national  organ  donor  network, 
is  threatening  to  sue  the  federal  government  to  pre- 
vent the  release  of  data  on  individual  heart  and  kid- 
ney transplant  centers.  The  Richmond,  VA-based 
contractor  oversees  the  organ  allocation  system  com- 
piles information  about  organ  transplants  that  is  sub- 
mitted to  the  U.S.  Department  of  Health  and  Human 
Services.  The  records  include  median  waiting  times 


and  the  numbers  of  organ  offers  that  are  tumed  down 
both  for  medical  and  non-medical  reasons.  The 
requests  for  the  records  were  filed  by  The  Plain 
Dealer  under  the  FOIA  in  June  1996.  Since  then  the 
Detroit  Free  Press,  ABC  news  and  two  grassroots 
transplant  groups  have  made  similar  requests.  On 
October  16,  federal  officials  informed  UNOS  that 
they  will  release  the  data  unless  a  federal  judge 
orders  otherwise. 

Charles  E.  Fiske  of  the  National  Transplant  Action 
Committee  asked,  "But  what  is  UNOS  there  for?  Is  it 
there  to  protect  patients  or  to  protect  the  institu- 
tions?" (Wendling,  Ted,  Dave  Davis  and  Joan 
Mazzolini.   "Organ  donor  group  threatens  suit  to 
keep  files  private,"  The  Plain  Dealer  [OH],  October 
31,  1997,  10-A.) 

[Ed. Note:  In  mid-November,  under  threats  that  the 
government  was  preparing  to  release  turndown  data 
for  organ  transplants,  UNOS'  board  voted  unani- 
mously to  release  the  information.   (Wendling,  Ted, 
Dave  Davis  and  Joan  Mazzolini.   "Florida,  California 
lead  in  organ  tumdowns,"  The  Plain  Dealer  [OH], 
November  21,  1997,  lA.) 


NOVEMBER 

Compromise  reached  on  sampling  for  the  2000 
census 

Following  months  of  controversy  about  the  poten- 
tial use  of  sampling  in  the  2000  census,  the  White 
House  and  Republican  Congressional  leaders  reached 
a  compromise  on  the  use  of  the  politically  sensitive 
statistical  technique.  They  agreed  to  allow  the 
Administration  to  experiment  with  statistical  sam- 
pling to  achieve  a  more  accurate  count  but  gave 
Republicans  time  and  resources  to  challenge  the  tech- 
nique in  court.  The  issue  has  been  controversial 
because  it  could  affect  the  future  political  composi- 
tion of  the  House  of  Representatives. 

House  Republican  leaders  have  opposed  the 
Administration's  planned  use  of  statistical  sampling 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


11 


to  supplement  traditional  person-by-person  head 
counts,  fearing  the  technique  could  be  used  to  pro- 
duce more  House  districts  dominated  by  racial 
minorities,  who  tend  to  vote  for  Democrats.  They 
also  argue  that  sampling  is  unconstitutional.  The 
Administration  and  Congressional  Democrats  argued 
that  minorities  traditionally  have  been  undercounted 
in  the  decennial  census  and  that  by  using  statistical 
sampling,  undercounting  will  be  reduced.  The  com- 
promise helped  clear  the  way  for  final  passage  of  the 
FY  1998  appropriations  bill  for  the  Departments  of 
Commerce,  Justice  and  State.    (Pianin,  Eric  and 
Helen  Dewar.  "Congress  Also  Clears  FDA  Changes, 
Works  Late  on  Spending  Bills,"  The  Washington 
Post,  November  10,  1997,  A04.) 

National  Academy  of  Sciences  exempted  from 
open  access  law 

Congress  passed  legislation  to  exempt  the  National 
Academy  of  Sciences  from  a  law  mandating  open 
access  to  its  deliberations  and  federal  oversight  of  its 
committees,  but  the  Academy  "will  have  to  provide 
extensive  public  information  about  many  aspects  of 
its  work."  Activist  groups  argued  in  law  suits  that 
the  NAS  committees,  which  traditionally  are  appoint- 
ed without  public  consultation  and  conduct  key  meet- 
ings in  private,  violated  the  1972  Federal  Advisory 
Committee  Act.  That  law  requires  open  meetings, 
"balanced"  committee  membership  and  federal  over- 
sight for  organizations  that  advise  the  federal  govem- 
ment. 

The  NAS  countered  that  Congress  never  intended 
the  FACA  to  apply  to  the  Academy,  which  must 
apply  its  own  professional  standards  for  committee 
membership  and  maintain  confidentiality  in  meetings 
to  ensure  that  its  advice  is  "independent  from  govern- 
ment..as  well  as  from  potential  outside  political  and 
special-interest  pressures."  (Suplee,  Curt.   "Congress 
Addresses  Access  to  Academy  of  Sciences,"  The 
Washington  Post,  November  17,  1997,  A21.) 

Plan  revealed  to  blame  Castro  if  Glenn  mission 
failed 

Previously  classified  records  revealed  that  had 
John  Glenn's  space  flight  in  February  1952  failed, 


American  military  planners  were  thinking  of  blaming 
Fidel  Castro.  The  operation  was  called  Operation 
Dirty  Trick,  and  according  to  long-secret  documents 
recently  made  public,  the  idea  was  "to  provide  irrev- 
ocable proof  that,  should  the  MERCURY  manned 
orbit  flight  fail,  the  fault  lies  with  the  Communists  et 
al  Cuba."  The  planners  suggested  in  a  February  2, 
1962,  memo  that  this  could  be  accomplished  "by 
manufacturing  various  pieces  of  evidence  which 
would  prove  electronic  interference  on  the  part  of  the 
Cubans."  (Lardner,  George,  Jr.  and  Walter  Pincus. 
"Military  Had  Plan  to  Blame  Cuba  If  Glenn's  Space 
Mission  Failed,"  The  Washington  Post,  November 
19,  1997,  A2.) 

National  Archives  destroys  Naval  Research 
Laboratory  historical  records 

Archivist  of  the  United  States  John  Carlin  has 
ordered  an  investigation  into  the  destruction  by  the 
National  Archives  of  records  that  the  Naval  Research 
Laboratory  considered  of  permanent  historical  value. 
Carlin  said,  "If  the  process  is  flawed,  or  the  evalua- 
tion criteria  are  inadequate,  then  obviously  the  situa- 
tion must  be  fixed."  Paul  Gaffney,  the  Chief  of 
Naval  Research,  wrote  to  Carlin  on  November  13, 
stating  that  "the  historical  record  of  our  nation's  sci- 
entific and  technical  heritage  has  suffered  a  serious 
and  irreparable  loss."  The  destroyed  records  includ- 
ed material  that  documented  the  work  of  the  pioneers 
of  American  radar,  path-breaking  acoustic  and 
oceanographic  research,  early  sonar  research,  the  first 
U.S.  satellite  program,  and  the  early  rocket-based 
astronomical  research. 

Gaffney  contends  that  Naval  Research  Laboratory 
personnel  received  no  notification  of  the  National 
Archives'  plan  to  destroy  these  records  they  consid- 
ered permanently  valuable  and  which  constituted  the 
core  of  the  agency's  corporate  memory.   Carlin  con- 
tends the  records  were  destroyed  following  proce- 
dures established  years  ago  for  evaluating  naval  labo- 
ratory records,  and  that  National  Archives  staff  did 
not  consider  the  destroyed  material  to  meet  the  tests 
for  permanent  value.  Carlin  pointed  out  that  the 
Navy  had  been  notified  about  the  pending  destruction 
and  had  "raised  no  objection."  (Miller,  Page  Putnam. 


12 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


"Archivist  Orders  an  Investigation  of  Recent 
Destruction  of  Naval  Laboratory  Records,"  NCC 
Washington  Update,  vol.  3,  #46,  November  19, 
1997.) 


DECEMBER 

Tape  transcripts  reveal  Nixon  White  House  media 
strategy 

Transcripts  of  Nixon  White  House  tapes  released 
in  October  further  reveal  a  President  obsessed  with 
efforts  to  improve  his  image  and  eagerly  plotting  to 
discredit  his  detractors.  The  National  Archives 
released  200  hours  of  conversations  after  a  long  court 
battle.   In  a  July  2,  1971,  tape  recorded  discussion 
with  aide  Charles  Colson,  Nixon  said  the  best  way  to 
intimidate  the  nation's  three  major  television  net- 
works was  to  keep  the  constant  threat  of  an  antitrust 
suit  hanging  over  them.  Colson  played  a  major  role 
in  pressuring  the  news  media  to  change  their  critical 
coverage  of  the  Nixon  Administration.  Colson  told 
Nixon  "keeping  this  case  in  a  pending  status  gives 
one  hell  of  a  club  on  an  economic  issue  that  means  a 
great  deal  to  those  three  networks. ..something  of  a 
sword  of  Damocles." 

Nixon  responded,  "Our  gain  is  more  important 
than  the  economic  gain.  We  don't  give  a  goddamn 
about  the  economic  gain.  Our  game  here  is  solely 
political. ...As  far  as  screwing  them  is  concerned,  I'm 
very  glad  to  do  it."  The  White  House  kept  the 
Justice  Department  from  filing  suit  until  April  1972 
when  the  government  accused  the  networks  of 
monopolizing  prime-time  entertainment  with  their 
own  programs.  The  suits  were  dismissed  in  1974 
after  the  Nixon  White  House  refused  to  turn  over 
subpoenaed  records.   (Pincus,  Walter  and  George 
Lardner  Jr.   "Nixon  Hoped  Antitrust  Threat  Would 
Sway  Network  Coverage,"  The  Washington  Post, 
December  1,  1997,  A 1.) 

U.S.  role  in  melting  Nazi  gold  revealed  in  long- 
secret  documents 

"According  to  long-secret  documents  that  the 
Federal  Reserve  Bank  of  New  York  plans  to  release 


to  a  conference  of  historians  tracking  Nazi  gold,"  in 
1952  the  United  States  melted  down  gold  plates,  but- 
tons, coins  and  smoking-pipe  omaments  that  were 
apparently  looted  from  Hitler's  victims.  The  gold 
bars  were  then  turned  over  to  European  central 
banks.    Jewish  groups  and  the  United  States 
Government  plan  to  use  the  documents  to  press  their 
case  that  $54  million  in  gold  remaining  in  the  posses- 
sion of  the  Tripartite  Commission  for  the  Restitution 
of  Monetary  Gold,  the  panel  assembled  to  return 
looted  assets  to  central  banks,  should  be  given  to 
Holocaust  survivors  and  their  heirs. 

Other  recently  declassified  documents  from 
American  archives  reveal  details  from  recent  investi- 
gations of  the  trail  of  wartime  assets  that  have  now 
spanned  the  globe.  For  example,  a  declassified 
coded  message  released  by  the  National  Security 
Agency  shows  what  happened  to  millions  of  dollars 
paid  by  the  United  States  and  Switzerland  for  the 
care  of  prisoners  of  war  held  by  the  Japanese.  The 
newly  released  transcript  of  a  coded  message  written 
by  Swiss  officials — the  neutral  country  that  handled 
the  funds — shows  that  a  secret  deal  was  reached  in 
August  1944  by  Swiss  and  Japanese  officials  to 
divert  40  percent  of  those  funds  to  pay  off  Japan's 
debts  to  Swiss  businesses.  (Sanger,  David  E.   "U.S. 
Melted  Down  Gold  Items  from  Nazis,"  The  New  York 
Times,  December  1,  1997,  A8.) 

U.S.  argues  that  cutting  would  jeopardize  Nixon 
tapes 

A  federal  court  ordered  the  National  Archives  to 
return  all  "personal  or  private  conversations"  on  the 
Nixon  White  House  tapes  to  the  late  president's 
estate.  In  an  appeal  brief  Justice  Department  lawyers 
said  this  would  jeopardize  "virtually  all"  of  the  950 
reels  of  tape  from  the  Nixon  presidency  that 
Congress  confiscated  by  law  in  1974  to  keep  Nixon 
from  destroying  them.  The  Justice  Department  said 
that  it  has  no  obligation  to  cut  out  portions  of  the 
tapes  to  satisfy  the  demands  of  Nixon's  estate. 
Nixon's  privacy  interests,  the  Justice  brief  said,  will 
be  preserved  because  the  original  tapes  will  be  kept 
intact  in  a  special  vault,  without  any  provision  for 
public  access.   A  hearing  is  scheduled  for  late 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


13 


February.  (Lardner,  George  Jr.  "U.S.  Argues  Against 
Return  of  Excerpts  of  Nixon  Tapes,"  The  Washington 
Post,  December  2,  1997,  A17.) 

U.S.  sued  for  violating  Freedom  of  Information 
Act 

Public  Citizen  filed  a  federal  lawsuit  in  U.S. 
District  Court  for  the  District  of  Columbia  to  enforce 
recent  federal  statutes  designed  to  make  it  easier  for 
the  public  to  obtain  access  to  govemment  informa- 
tion. The  suit  charged  that  seven  major  federal  agen- 
cies have  not  complied  with  statutes  requiring  that 
they  make  available  guides  and  indices  to  help  the 
public  obtain  agency  records.    "The  Clinton 
Administration  has  failed  to  live  up  to  its  commit- 
ment to  make  govemment  information  more  open  to 
the  public...,"  said  Michael  Tankersley,  the  Public 
Citizen  Litigation  Group  attorney  who  filed  the  suit. 

In  1995,  Congress  directed  all  federal  agencies  to 
compile  a  "current  and  complete  inventory:  of  their 
information  resources,  including  directories  that 
could  be  used  to  establish  an  electronic  service  for 
locating  major  govemment  information  systems.  The 
following  year,  in  the  Electronic  Freedom  of 
Information  Act  Amendments,  Congress  directed 
agencies  to  make  available  a  guide  containing  an 
index  with  a  description  of  all  major  information  and 
record  locator  systems  and  a  handbook  describing 
how  to  obtain  information  from  these  systems  under 
the  FOIA  and  other  statutes. 

According  to  Public  Citizen,  the  Office  of 
Management  and  Budget  was  supposed  to  take  a 
leadership  role  in  implementing  these  requirements. 
But  many  agencies,  including  0MB,  have  ignored 
these  mandates.  The  seven  agencies  named  as  defen- 
dants are  0MB;  the  Office  of  Administration  in  the 
Executive  Office  of  the  President;  the  Office  of  the 
U.S.  Trade  Representative;  the  Department  of 
Education;  the  Department  of  Energy;  the 
Department  of  Justice;  and  the  Department  of  State. 
"This  lawsuit  will  force  these  agencies  to  give  the 
public  the  tools  needed  to  navigate  through  the 
bureaucratic  corridors  of  cyberspace,"  said  Lucinda 
Sikes,  another  Public  Citizen  working  on  the  case. 
(Public  Citizen  press  release.   "Federal  Agencies 


Violating  Freedom  of  Information  Act,  Lawsuit 
Alleges,"  December  4,  1997.) 

[Ed.  Note:  The  press  release  is  available  online  at 
http:/Avww.  citizen,  org/foi  asuit.htm] 

Tobacco  industry  turns  over  documents  to 
Congress 

A  dramatic  confrontation  between  Representative 
Thomas  Bliley  (R-VA)  and  the  tobacco  industry  has 
resulted  in  a  cache  of  sensitive  intemal  company  doc- 
uments being  turned  over  to  a  Congressional  commit- 
tee— a  departure  from  years  of  legal  maneuvering  to 
keep  industry  secrets  hidden.   Over  800  documents 
were  delivered  to  Congress,  less  than  24  hours  after 
Bliley,  a  long-time  industry  supporter,  issued  a  sub- 
poena for  them.   "Today's  development  will  give 
Congress  the  information  it  needs  to  make  more 
informed  and  responsible  decisions"  on  the  proposed 
settlement,  Bliley  said. 

The  documents  were  not  released  publicly,  howev- 
er, and  Bliley  gave  no  indication  of  when  that  might 
happen,  saying  only  that  the  committee  will  establish 
"a  bipartisan  process  for  reviewing  and  disclosing" 
them.  "These  documents  are  only  the  tip  of  the  ice- 
berg," said  Senator  Patrick  Leahy  (D-VT).  And 
Minnesota  Attomey  General  Hubert  H.  Humphrey 
said,  "The  smoking  guns  are  trickling  out,  but  the 
smoking  howitzers  remain  under  lock  and  key." 
Matthew  Myers,  of  the  National  Center  for  Tobacco- 
Free  Kids,  said  he  hoped  that  Bliley's  comments  were 
not  an  indication  that  the  documents  would  be  kept 
private.  "It's  as  important  for  the  American  public  to 
see  these  documents  as  for  Congress — so  that  the  cit- 
izens of  the  country  can  make  an  informed  decision 
about  what  Congress  should  do,"  Myers  said.  (Torry, 
Saundra  and  John  Schwartz.   "Tobacco  Industry 
Delivers  Documents  to  Congress,"  The  Washington 
Post,  December  6,  1997,  A9.) 

White  House  continues  pattern  of  belated  release 
of  subpoenaed  material 

Throughout  the  summer  and  fall  of  1997,  many 
articles  have  appeared  in  the  press  about  the  belated 
released  of  subpoenaed  material  to  Congress,  includ- 


14 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


ing  video  tapes,  concerning  President  Clinton's  fund- 
raising  activities  for  the  1996  presidential  campaign. 
This  article  is  about  notes  taken  in  the  White  House 
during  discussions  of  the  growing  campaign  finance 
controversy.  Although  the  notes  appear  to  add  little 
to  the  ongoing  campaign  finance  investigations,  they 
could  become  a  new  source  of  controversy  for  the 
Clinton  Administration.  White  House  spokesman 
Lanny  J.  Davis  said  he  could  not  explain  the  delay  in 
finding  the  notes,  which  he  acknowledged  fall  within 
the  scope  of  subpoenas  for  materials  relating  to  fund- 
raising  in  the  White  House  that  were  issued  as  long 
ago  as  March  24.   (Schmidt,  Susan.   "White  House 
Gives  Aide's  Notes  to  Congress,"  The  Washington 
Post,  December  9,  1997,  A6.) 

Attorney  General  declines  to  hand  over  FBI 
memo  to  Congress 

Attomey  General  Janet  Reno  refused  to  comply 
with  a  Congressional  subpoena  for  a  confidential 
memorandum  in  which  FBI  Director  Louis  Freeh 
urged  her  to  seek  an  independent  counsel  in  the  cam- 
paign finance  scandal.  The  House  Government 
Reform  and  Oversight  Committee,  having  called 
Reno  and  Freeh  to  testify  at  a  hearing  on  December 
9,  sought  the  memorandum  as  part  of  its  investiga- 
tion of  Reno's  handling  of  the  independent  counsel 
issue.  Reno  declined  to  provide  the  document,  point- 
ing to  the  need  to  protect  an  ongoing  investigation 
and  to  preserve  the  confidentiality  of  the  decision- 
making process  within  the  Department  of  Justice. 
(Suro,  Roberto.   "Reno  Declines  to  Hand  Over  Freeh 
Memo,"  The  Washington  Post,  December  9,  1997, 
A6.) 

Judge  orders  government  to  pay  sanctions  for 
withholding  information 

In  a  follow-up  to  a  "Less  Access"  item  from  four 
years  ago,  a  federal  judge  ordered  the  U.S.  govern- 
ment to  pay  sanctions  of  $285,864  for  the  "dishon- 
est" and  "reprehensible"  conduct  of  the  White  House 
and  Justice  Department  in  failing  to  reveal  to  the 
court  key  information  about  the  membership  of  the 
health  care  reform  task  force  chaired  by  Hillary 
Rodham  Clinton.   "[I]t  is  clear  that  the  decisions  here 


were  made  at  the  highest  levels  of  government,  and 
the  government  itself  is-and  should  be-accountable 
when  its  officials  run  amok,"   U.S.  District  Court 
Judge  Royce  C.  Lamberth  wrote  in  his  opinion.   "It 
seems  that  some  government  officials  never  learn 
that  the  cover-up  can  be  worse  than  the  underlying 
conduct."  (Locy,  Toni.  "Govemment  Ordered  to  Pay 
Sanctions  for  Dishonest  About  Health  Care  Task 
Force,"  The  Washington  Post,  December  19,  1997, 
A21.) 

A  handful  of  examples  are  also  avail- 
able about  '^More  Access"  during 
this  same  period: 

EPA  plans  expansion  of  "right-to-know" 

The  Environmental  Protection  Agency 
announced  plans  for  an  ambitious  project  to  expand 
its  "right-to-know"  initiatives  so  that  people  who 
live  near  hundreds  of  factories  in  five  major  indus- 
tries can  have  easy  online  access  to  additional  data 
about  the  pollution  from  those  plants.   This  is  the 
first  time,  profiles  of  the  environmental  perfor- 
mance of  the  producers  of  oil  products,  steel,  other 
metals,  autos  and  paper  have  been  made  available, 
indicating  which  factories  may  present  the  biggest 
environmental  problems. 

Industries  argued  the  evaluation  is  misleading. 
The  project  expands  on  the  Toxics  Release 
Inventory,  an  annual  survey,  published  online  and 
in  printed  reports,  that  has  been  credited  with 
encouraging  companies  to  voluntarily  control  their 
pollution. 

The  new  project  is  called  the  Sector  Facility 
Indexing  Project,  but  the  affected  industries  consid- 
er it  the  Scarlet  Letter  Initiative,  because  they  fear 
that  it  will  unfairly  identify  some  of  them  as  pol- 
luters. The  industries  are  trying  to  block  the  pro- 
ject, arguing  that  the  release  of  the  information  will 
confuse  and  alarm  the  public.  (Cushman,  John  H. 
Jr.  "E.P.A.  Is  Pressing  Plan  to  Publicize  Pollution 
Data,"  77?^  New  York  Times,  August  12,  1997, 
http://new  york  times.com/library/cyber/week/ 
081297pollute.html) 


LESS  ACCESS 


JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


15 


Americans  can  provide  more  information  about 
themselves 

The  Clinton  Administration  announced  that  for 
the  first  time  Americans  will  be  able  to  choose 
more  than  one  racial  category  to  describe  them- 
selves on  census  and  other  federal  forms.  The  deci- 
sion ends  a  long-standing  practice  of  requiring  peo- 
ple to  identify  themselves  as  a  member  of  only  one 
racial  group  despite  growing  complaints  that  the 
nation's  racial  composition  is  increasingly  diverse. 
"This  gives  far  more  flexibility  for  people  to 
express  their  multiracial  heritage,"  said  0MB 
Director  Franklin  Raines.  How  the  census  collects 
data  is  important  because  the  numbers  are  used  to 
redraw  political  boundaries,  enforce  civil  rights 
protections  and  administer  many  programs  that 
depend  on  racial  data. 

In  the  last  census,  Americans  could  mark  just 
one  box  and  were  given  these  choices:  white,  black, 
American  Indian,  Eskimo,  Aleut  or  several  Asian  or 
Pacific  Islander  groups.  The  result  was  a  set  of 
population  figures  that  could  be  neatly  tabulated, 
but  left  many  dissatisfied  at  being  forced  to  choose 
one  heritage  over  another.  Nearly  10  million 
Americans  marked  "other"  rather  than  choose  one 
of  the  basic  categories.  In  the  2000  census  people 
can  check  off  as  many  categories  as  they  like, 
yielding  a  much  more  complex  view  of  the 
American  population.  (Vobejda,  Barbara.   "Census 
Expands  Options  for  Multiracial  Families,"  The 
Washington  Post,  October  30,  1997,  All.) 

Best  federal  government  web  sites  chosen 

Joyce  Kasman  Valenza,  a  high  school  librarian, 
wrote  an  article  for  a  Philadelphia  newspaper  fea- 
turing a  number  of  local,  state,  and  federal  govern- 
ment web  sites  she  considered  among  the  best  that 
exemplify  Thomas  Jefferson's  axiom,  "Whenever 
the  people  are  well-informed,  they  can  be  trusted 
with  their  own  government."  Valenza  said:  "To 
Jefferson,  an  informed  citizenry  was  essential  to  the 
proper  functioning  of  a  democracy.   Self-govern- 
ment would  not  be  possible  unless  citizens  were 
well-educated  and  had  free  access  to  information. 
Jefferson  would  have  really  liked  the  World  Wide 


Web."  She  observes  that  young  citizens  can  read 
the  actual  texts  of  laws,  speeches,  judicial  deci- 
sions, and,  of  course,  political  propaganda.   Among 
the  best  of  the  federal  executive  and  legislative 
branch  web  sites  she  chose  are: 

•  http://www.whitehouse.govAVHAVelcome.html 

•  http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/kids/html/ 
kidshome.html 

•  http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/pubs.html 

•  http://www.state.gov/www/ 
background-notes/index. html 

•  http://www.state.gov/www/regionsdigital.html 

•  http.// www.  census,  gov 

•  http://thomas.loc.gov/ 

•  http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html 
The  judicial  branch  is  represented  by  a  web  site 

hosted  by  Northwestern  University,  instead  of  the 
federal  government.  It  is  a  multimedia  database  of 
U.S.  Supreme  Court  information: 
http://oyez.at.nwai.edu/oyez.html 

(Valenza,  Joyce  Kasman.   "Sites  That  Provide 
Government  Information  to  the  People:  Laws, 
Speeches  and  Court  Decisions  Are  Among  a 
Wealth  of  Documents  at  Local,  State  and  Federal 
Levels,"  Philadelphia  Inquirer,  November  13, 
1997,  F04.) 

Government  Printing  Office  thrives  in  electronic 
age 

The  Government  Printing  Office,  the  federal 
government's  publisher,  has  used  new  technology  to 
make  information  available  to  the  public  so  effec- 
tively that  Congress  has  considered  changing  the 
agency's  name  to  reflect  the  cyberspace  age.   Eric 
Peterson,  staff  director  of  the  Joint  Committee  on 
Printing,  said  GPO  has  "been  on  the  forefront  of 
helping  the  government  emerge  from  the  classic 
printing  environment  to  electronic  information 
access."  For  example,  before  GPO  made  the 
Federal  Register  available  on  the  Internet  in  1994, 
government  presses  printed  33,000  copies  a  night  at 
an  average  of  225  pages  per  issue.  Currently,  GPO 
prints  23,000  paper  copies,  while  1  million  copies 
are  downloaded  every  month  from  the  Internet. 
Federal  laws,  the  United  States  Code,  fill  35  bound 


16 


ALA  WASHINGTON  OFFICE 


volumes  that  cost  about  $2,000.  The  same  informa- 
tion fits  on  one  compact  disc  that  sells  for  $37.   At 
the  same  time,  sales  of  the  disc  have  fallen  since 
GPO  made  the  United  States  Code  available  on  the 
Internet  for  free. 

Senator  John  Warner  (R-VA),  who  chairs  the 
Joint  Committee  on  Printing,  wants  GPO  to  ensure 
that  all  government  documents  are  made  accessible 
to  the  public,  especially  through  electronic  formats 
at  libraries.  Warner  wants  to  channel  all  federal 
government  publications  printed  by  a  private  busi- 
ness or  other  another  agency  through  GPO's 
Superintendent  of  Documents.   "Free  and  open 
access  to  information  created  at  taxpayer  expense  is 
the  principle  which  has  enabled  the  United  States  to 
endure  and  prosper  for  over  200  years,"  Warner 
said.  (Johnson,  Mark.   "Venerable  GPO  thrives  in 
cyberspace,"  Richmond  Tunes  Dispatch,  November 
30,  1997,  A2.) 

[Ed.  Note:  The  GPO  Access  system  is  found  at: 
http://www.  access.gpo.gov] 


SeiTii-annual  updates  of  this  publication  have  been  compiled  in  two  indexed  volumes  covering  tlie  periods  April  1981-December 
1987  and  Januaty  1988-Deccmber  1991.  Less  Access...  updates  are  available  for  $1.00;  the  1981-1987  volume  is  $7.00;  the  1988- 
1991  volume  is  $10.00.  To  order,  contact  the  American  Librarv'  Association  Washington  Office,  1301  Pennsylvania  Avenue,  NW, 
#403,  Washington.  DC  20004-1701;  202-628-8410,  f;ix  202-628-8419.  All  orders  must  be  prepaid  and  must  include  a  self- 
addressed  mailing  label. 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1  997 


17 


The  COGI  Madison  Awards 
honor  champions  ofthepublic^s  right  to  know 

Since  1988,  the  Coalition  on  Government  Information  has  celebrated  Freedom  of  Information 
Day,  March  16,  the  birth  date  of  fourth  President  James  Madison.    Established  in  1989  by  the 
Coalition  and  the  National  Security  Archive,  the  award  is  presented  annually  to  honor  those  who 
have  championed,  protected  and  promoted  public  access  to  government  information  and  the  pub- 
lic's right  to  know.   The  Coalition,  initiated  in  1986  by  the  American  Library  Association,  is  com- 
posed of  public  interest  and  library  organizations  united  in  their  concern  about  the  public's  right  to 
be  well  informed  about  the  activities  of  the  federal  government. 

Recipients  of  the  James  Madison  Award: 

1997         Philanthropist  and  financier  George  Soros 

1996         The  National  Information  Infrastructure  Advisory  Council 

1995         The  Government  Printing  Office,  the  State  of  Maryland's  Sailor  Project,  the  Seatde 

(WA)  Public  Library,  and  the  Internet  Multicasting  Service's  Town  Hall  Project 
1994         Secretary  of  Energy  Hazel  O'Leary  and  former  ALA  Washington  Office  Director  Eileen 

D.  Cooke 
1993         The  legislators  who  led  the  passage  of  PL.  103-40,  the  GPO  Access  Act:  Vice  President 

Al  Gore,  original  sponsor  of  the  GPO  Gateway  to  Government  Act  when  he  was  in  the 

Senate;  Senators  Wendell  Ford  (D-KY)  and  Ted  Stevens  (R-AK);  Representatives 

Charlie  Rose  (D-NC)  and  Bill  Thomas  (R-CA) 
1992         Journalist  Nina  Totenberg,  author  Scott  Armstrong,  and  C-SPAN  founder  Brian  Lamb 
1991         Representative  Don  Edwards  (D-CA) 
1990         Senator  Frank  Lautenberg  (D-NJ),  Representative  Henry  Waxman  (D-CA),  journalist 

Philip  Shabecoff ,  and  the  Office  of  Toxic  Substances  of  the  U.S.  Environmental 

Protection  Agency 
1 989         Senator  Patrick  Leahy  (D-VT) 

Honorary  citations  also  were  presented  to  several  individuals  and  organizations  in  1996  and  1997. 

The  Coalition  seeks  nominations  for  the  annual  Madison  Award  and  for  honorary  citations  in 
December  of  each  year.   Send  nominations  to: 

Coalition  on  Government  Information 

c/o  of  American  Library  Association  Washington  Office 

1301  Pennsylvania  Avenue,  NW 

Suite  403 

Washington,  D.C.  20004 

tel:  800-941-8478 

fax:  202-628-8419 

e-mail:  alawash@alawash.org 


LESS  ACCESS    •    JULY  -  DECEMBER  1997 


19